Brute Facts, Social Facts, and Institutional Facts

نویسنده

  • Daniel R. Montello
چکیده

Geographic regions (henceforth, regions for short) are spatially extended pieces of (near) earth surface that share some aspect of similarity across their extents. The most fundamental aspect of similarity shared within a region is "locational similarity"-proximity. But regions nearly always share common thematic content or activity too. That is, regions are defined not just spatially but according to the human and natural entities or processes occurring there. Regionalization is spatial categorization, and importantly, this spatiality is literal rather than metaphorical, as it is with most other category systems. The modifier "geographic" implies a region of space that is prototypically two-dimensional (though often bumpy or uneven) and at or near the earth surface. Volumetric exceptions exist underground and in the atmosphere, but they are rare given the geogra­ pher's interest in the earth as the home of human habitation. Also because of the human-centered focus of geography, the human and natural themes that provide content for regions are usually phenomena at human-centered spatial and temporal scales-not too fast or small, not too slow or large (Montello 2001). The fact that geographic regions typically encompass places that are close together is interesting and conceptually nontrivial because it leads to a generalization about the shape of regions. Regions tend to be

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

An Illuminating Exchange: The Construction of Social Reality

A Two-Levelled Ontology In The Construction of Social Reality, John Searle argues for a two-level ontology along the following lines. Facts on the lower level – which he calls brute facts – can exist independently of human beings and their institutions. Facts on the upper level, which he calls institutional facts, depend on human institutions and above all on an associated ‘collective intention...

متن کامل

Delegation of Power in Normative Multiagent Systems

In this paper we reconsider the definition of counts-as relations in normative multiagent systems under the light of agent theory: counts-as relations do not directly provide an abstract interpretation of brute facts in terms of institutional facts. We argue that in many cases the inference of institutional facts from brute facts is the result of actions of agents acting on behalf of the normat...

متن کامل

Normative Multi-Agent Organizations A Programming Language and its Interpreter

Multi-agent systems are viewed as consisting of individual agents whose behaviors are regulated by organization artifacts. This abstract presents a programming language, which is designed to implement norm-based organization artifacts, by means of an example and explains the execution behavior of the language interpreter. In order to achieve the overall objectives of multi-agent systems, the be...

متن کامل

Ludwig Fahrbach Understanding Brute Facts

Brute facts are facts that have no explanation. If we come to know that a fact is brute, we obviously don’t get an explanation of that fact. Nevertheless, we do make some sort of epistemic gain. In this essay, I give an account of that epistemic gain, and suggest that the idea of brute facts allows us to distinguish between the notion of explanation and the notion of understanding. I also discu...

متن کامل

A note on Brute vs. Institutional Facts: Modal Logic of Equivalence Up To a Signature

The paper investigates the famous Searlean distinction between “brute” and “institutional” concepts from a logical point of view. We show how the partitioning of the non-logical alphabet—e.g., into “brute” and “institutional” atoms—gives rise to interesting modal properties. A modal logic, called UpTo-logic, is introduced and investigated which formalizes the notion of (propositional) logical e...

متن کامل

Conceptualizing Learning Experiences: Contributions and Mediations of the Social, Personal, and Brute

This article conceptualizes and elaborates what constitutes learning experiences. It does so from a perspective that centres on experiences as arising through relations between social and personal worldsyet also acknowledges the mediation of brute facts (i.e., nature). The social contributions are twofold, yet quite distinct. First, there are immediate social experiences that are projected by t...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009